Lev Tolstoy, one of the greatest literary figures in history, is renowned for his profound insights into human nature, society, and morality. Among the many subjects Tolstoy grappled with in his works, his criticism of Napoleon Bonaparte stands out as particularly significant. In his epic novel War and Peace, Tolstoy not only recounts the events of Napoleon’s invasion of Russia but also offers a deep critique of the man himself. Tolstoy challenges the traditional narrative of the French emperor as a heroic figure, instead presenting him as a symbol of the destructive nature of power and ambition.
Napoleon: The “Great Man” Myth Debunked
Tolstoy’s critique of Napoleon begins with a fundamental rejection of the “Great Man” theory of history, which suggests that history is shaped by the actions of exceptional individuals. In War and Peace, Tolstoy argues that the course of history is not determined by the will of powerful leaders but by the collective actions of countless individuals, each driven by their own motivations. Napoleon, who is often celebrated as a military genius and a decisive leader, is depicted by Tolstoy as a figure who is, in many ways, a prisoner of circumstances, driven by vanity and delusions of grandeur.
Tolstoy challenges the notion that Napoleon’s conquests were the result of his genius. Instead, he portrays Napoleon as a man who believed in his own myth, a belief that ultimately led to his downfall. Tolstoy strips away the aura of invincibility that surrounded Napoleon, showing him as a flawed human being whose ambitions brought suffering to millions.
The Moral Critique: Napoleon as an Antithesis to Tolstoyan Values
Tolstoy’s moral critique of Napoleon is perhaps the most scathing aspect of his portrayal. For Tolstoy, Napoleon embodies the antithesis of the values that he held dear—humility, compassion, and a deep respect for the sanctity of human life. Tolstoy viewed Napoleon’s actions as driven by egoism and a thirst for power, which led to immense human suffering.
In War and Peace, Tolstoy contrasts Napoleon with figures like Prince Andrei Bolkonsky and Pierre Bezukhov, who grapple with questions of morality, purpose, and the meaning of life. While these characters seek deeper truths and strive to live according to higher principles, Napoleon is depicted as a man who is indifferent to the suffering he causes, focused solely on his own glory. Tolstoy’s depiction of the Battle of Borodino, where countless lives are lost, serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of Napoleon’s ambitions.
The Illusion of Control: Tolstoy’s Philosophical Critique
Another key aspect of Tolstoy’s criticism of Napoleon is his exploration of the illusion of control. Tolstoy was deeply skeptical of the idea that any individual, no matter how powerful, could truly control the course of events. In War and Peace, he emphasizes the role of chance, fate, and the countless small actions of ordinary people in shaping history. Napoleon’s belief that he could bend history to his will is portrayed as not only misguided but dangerous.
Tolstoy’s philosophical critique extends to the very nature of power itself. He suggests that those who seek to dominate others are often blind to the limits of their power and the unintended consequences of their actions. Napoleon’s ultimate failure, according to Tolstoy, is not just a personal downfall but a lesson in the futility of trying to impose one’s will on the world through force.
Legacy and Impact: Tolstoy’s Enduring Critique
Tolstoy’s criticism of Napoleon in War and Peace has had a lasting impact on how the French emperor is perceived in literature and history. By challenging the glorification of Napoleon, Tolstoy invites readers to question the narratives that celebrate conquest and power. His portrayal of Napoleon as a cautionary figure, rather than a hero, serves as a powerful reminder of the moral and human costs of ambition.
In the broader context of Tolstoy’s work, his critique of Napoleon reflects his deep commitment to exploring the moral dimensions of human life. Tolstoy’s rejection of violence, his advocacy for non-resistance, and his belief in the power of love and humility are all woven into his portrayal of Napoleon as a tragic figure—a man whose pursuit of power led him away from the very values that Tolstoy believed were essential for a meaningful life.
Conclusion
Lev Tolstoy’s criticism of Napoleon is not just a historical analysis but a profound moral and philosophical statement. Through his depiction of Napoleon in War and Peace, Tolstoy challenges the glorification of power and ambition, offering instead a vision of history that is shaped by the collective actions of individuals and the moral choices they make. Napoleon, in Tolstoy’s view, serves as a reminder of the dangers of egoism and the importance of humility, compassion, and a deep respect for the sanctity of human life.
Cross College 
Leave a comment