Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) is one of the most influential political philosophers in Western thought. His works, particularly Leviathan (1651), laid the foundation for much of modern political theory, especially concerning the nature of human society, the role of government, and the social contract. Hobbes’ ideas were revolutionary for their time and continue to be relevant as they explore the tensions between order and chaos, individual freedom and collective authority, and the human instinct for survival.
In this blog post, we’ll delve into the core elements of Hobbes’ philosophy, focusing on his views on human nature, the state of nature, the social contract, and the role of government.
1. Human Nature: A Pessimistic View
At the heart of Hobbes’ philosophy is a fundamentally pessimistic view of human nature. Hobbes believed that humans are driven by self-interest and are naturally inclined toward competition, distrust, and conflict.
- Hobbes’ View of Humanity: Hobbes argued that human beings are motivated primarily by the desire for self-preservation and the avoidance of pain. He believed that humans are naturally equal in their ability to harm one another, which leads to a constant state of insecurity and fear. In Leviathan, Hobbes famously describes life in the state of nature (without government) as “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
- The State of Nature: Hobbes’ concept of the state of nature refers to a hypothetical condition in which there is no government or laws to regulate behavior. In this state, individuals are free to pursue their own interests, but this freedom leads to inevitable conflict. Because resources like food, shelter, and security are scarce, individuals compete violently to secure them. Without a central authority to maintain order, Hobbes believed that society would descend into a war of “every man against every man.”
Hobbes’ view of human nature is one of perpetual conflict unless there is an external force (a government) to impose peace and order.
2. The Social Contract: Escaping the State of Nature
Hobbes’ solution to the chaos of the state of nature is the concept of the social contract. According to Hobbes, individuals willingly surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of a sovereign power in exchange for security and protection from the violence of the state of nature.
- The Social Contract Theory: Hobbes argued that rational individuals, recognizing the dangers of the state of nature, would agree to form a society governed by a powerful sovereign. This social contract involves individuals transferring their rights to the sovereign in exchange for peace and order. In doing so, they escape the constant state of war and live under a system of laws that regulate behavior and protect their lives and property.
- Absolute Sovereignty: Unlike later philosophers such as John Locke or Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Hobbes believed that the sovereign’s power must be absolute. He argued that only an absolute authority—a Leviathan—could maintain peace and prevent society from reverting to the chaos of the state of nature. The sovereign must have the final say in all matters, including laws, justice, and even morality, as it is the sole entity capable of ensuring societal stability.
Hobbes’ social contract is grounded in a view of government as a necessary evil. While the loss of personal freedoms under the sovereign is significant, Hobbes believed that this was a small price to pay for the peace and security provided by a strong, centralized authority.
3. The Role of Government: Leviathan
In Leviathan, Hobbes outlines his vision of an ideal government, which he believes should have nearly unlimited power to maintain order and prevent society from descending into chaos. His philosophy of governance is rooted in the belief that a strong, centralized authority is essential to protect individuals from their own worst instincts.
- The Leviathan State: The title of Hobbes’ work, Leviathan, refers to a biblical sea monster, which Hobbes uses as a metaphor for the power of the state. Just as the Leviathan is a powerful, awe-inspiring creature, Hobbes’ ideal government is a vast and all-encompassing authority. For Hobbes, the Leviathan is necessary to keep humanity’s baser instincts in check.
- Monarchy as the Ideal Form of Government: Hobbes was a staunch supporter of monarchy, arguing that a single, undivided sovereign power was the most effective way to ensure stability. He believed that democracy or any form of divided government would lead to conflict, as competing factions would undermine the authority of the state and lead to chaos.
- The Role of Law: For Hobbes, the primary function of government is to enact and enforce laws that prevent individuals from harming one another. The government exists to protect individuals from the dangers of the state of nature, and the sovereign’s laws are the means by which order is maintained. Hobbes believed that without the rule of law, human life would once again become chaotic and violent.
Hobbes’ view of government is starkly authoritarian by modern standards, but it reflects his deep concern with the need for order and the dangers of unchecked human nature.
4. Hobbes’ Legacy: Influence on Modern Political Thought
Hobbes’ philosophy has had a lasting impact on the development of modern political thought, particularly regarding the nature of authority, the justification for government, and the role of the individual within society.
- Foundations of Social Contract Theory: Hobbes is considered one of the founders of social contract theory, a concept that would later be developed by philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. While Locke and Rousseau took a more optimistic view of human nature and advocated for more limited government, they built on Hobbes’ central idea that government derives its authority from the consent of the governed.
- The Nature of Authority and Power: Hobbes’ arguments for a strong, centralized authority have been influential in the development of theories of state power, particularly in times of crisis. His ideas resonate in discussions about the balance between individual freedom and state authority, especially when it comes to questions of national security and public safety.
- The Role of Fear in Politics: Hobbes’ philosophy also offers insights into the role of fear in politics. He understood that fear—of violence, of chaos, of death—drives people to seek protection under a powerful authority. This idea remains relevant in contemporary discussions about the role of government in providing security, especially in the face of threats like terrorism or pandemics.
Conclusion: The Timeless Relevance of Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes’ philosophy is deeply concerned with the need for order, security, and stability in human society. His pessimistic view of human nature led him to advocate for a strong, centralized government, capable of preventing the violence and chaos that he believed would naturally arise in a state of nature.
Though his views on absolute authority may seem extreme by today’s standards, Hobbes’ insights into the nature of power, the role of government, and the importance of social contracts continue to shape modern political discourse. His ideas challenge us to think about the balance between individual freedom and collective security, a tension that remains central to political debates in the 21st century.
Cross College 
Leave a comment