Ludwig Wittgenstein is one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century, and his work is often divided into two distinct periods: the early Wittgenstein, represented by his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, and the later Wittgenstein, exemplified by his posthumous work Philosophical Investigations. While the early Wittgenstein was concerned with the logical structure of language and reality, the later Wittgenstein moved toward a more nuanced understanding of language, focusing on its everyday use.
This shift in focus from abstract logical analysis to practical, contextual understanding is the hallmark of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. In this blog post, we will explore the key elements of the later Wittgenstein’s thought, focusing on his views on language, meaning, and how philosophical problems arise from misunderstandings of ordinary language.
1. Language as a Tool: The Concept of Language-Games
One of the central ideas in Wittgenstein’s later work is the notion of language-games. This concept contrasts sharply with his earlier view, where language was seen as a system of logical representation.
- Language-Games Defined: In Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein uses the term “language-game” to highlight the diverse and dynamic ways in which language functions in our everyday lives. Language-games are the various forms of linguistic activity we engage in, such as making requests, giving orders, asking questions, telling jokes, and more. Each of these activities represents a different use of language, depending on the context and the social norms governing communication in that situation.
- Meaning Through Use: For the later Wittgenstein, the meaning of a word is not something fixed or determined by its reference to objects in the world, as he argued in the Tractatus. Instead, meaning is derived from how a word is used within specific language-games. In other words, language is not merely a static system of symbols corresponding to objects or facts; it is a flexible tool shaped by human interactions and social practices. He famously stated, “the meaning of a word is its use in the language.”
This insight highlights the importance of understanding the context in which language is employed. The same word can have different meanings depending on the language-game being played, which shifts the focus away from rigid definitions and toward a more fluid, pragmatic understanding of language.
2. The Rejection of Private Language
Another key element of the later Wittgenstein’s thought is his critique of the idea of a private language. He challenges the notion that individuals could have a purely private, internal language that only they can understand.
- The Private Language Argument: Wittgenstein argues that language is inherently social and depends on shared rules and practices. If a language were truly private, it would be impossible to establish any criteria for correctness or meaning, because there would be no external standard by which to measure whether one’s use of the language is consistent. For Wittgenstein, the idea of a private language is incoherent because language needs a public framework of rules to function.
- Pain and Private Experiences: Wittgenstein uses the example of pain to illustrate his point. Although we may experience pain privately, the language we use to describe that pain is learned from others. The word “pain” does not derive its meaning from an inner sensation but from the public way in which people use the word in various contexts. This reinforces Wittgenstein’s argument that language is a social practice, grounded in shared human behavior, rather than a reflection of private mental states.
This critique of private language challenges traditional views in philosophy of mind and language, particularly those that suggest that our mental states are knowable only to ourselves and that language can function independently of the external world.
3. Philosophy as Therapy: Dissolving Problems
For the later Wittgenstein, philosophy is not about constructing grand theories or metaphysical systems; instead, it is a form of therapy aimed at clarifying our thoughts and dissolving philosophical problems that arise from misunderstandings of language.
- Philosophical Problems as Confusions: Wittgenstein believed that many philosophical problems, such as debates about free will, mind-body dualism, or the nature of reality, stem from a misunderstanding of how language works. These problems arise when philosophers take language out of its ordinary context and impose rigid logical structures on it, leading to confusion. Wittgenstein saw his task as uncovering these confusions and showing that once language is seen in its proper context, the problems often disappear.
- Therapeutic Approach: In his later philosophy, Wittgenstein viewed the role of philosophy as therapeutic, in the sense that it should help people see the world more clearly by untangling the knots of linguistic confusion. Rather than providing definitive answers, the goal is to help people understand how language functions in different situations so that they can avoid being misled by the appearance of philosophical problems.
This approach contrasts with traditional philosophy, which often seeks to resolve problems through abstract theorizing. Wittgenstein’s method emphasizes looking at how language is actually used in ordinary life to clear up conceptual confusions, thereby relieving the intellectual discomfort that often accompanies philosophical inquiry.
4. Forms of Life: The Social Foundation of Language
Another important element of Wittgenstein’s later work is his concept of forms of life. This idea refers to the shared background of cultural, social, and biological practices that make language and meaning possible.
- Forms of Life Defined: According to Wittgenstein, language is grounded in forms of life, which are the basic activities, behaviors, and interactions that humans engage in. These shared practices form the backdrop against which language-games are played. Without these common forms of life, communication would be impossible, because language requires a set of shared understandings about how the world works and how we interact with one another.
- Language and Social Context: Wittgenstein’s emphasis on forms of life reinforces the social nature of language. Meaning is not something that exists in isolation or in the mind of an individual; it is a product of the communal life that people share. The rules and practices governing language use are shaped by the broader cultural and social context in which people live, and this context gives meaning to the words we use.
The idea of forms of life highlights the interdependence of language and social practices, emphasizing that understanding language requires understanding the social world in which it is embedded.
5. The Limits of Language: “Whereof One Cannot Speak…”
Though Wittgenstein’s views evolved dramatically from the Tractatus to Philosophical Investigations, his later work still engages with the idea that there are limits to what language can express.
- The Limits of Language: In his early work, Wittgenstein famously declared, “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.” While the later Wittgenstein shifted away from the rigid logical boundaries of his earlier philosophy, he still believed that language has limits. However, these limits are now seen as arising from the specific contexts and uses of language. We should not try to stretch language beyond its natural limits by using it in ways that it was not meant to be used, such as trying to express metaphysical truths or abstract philosophical concepts without regard to everyday language.
- Silence and Understanding: For Wittgenstein, recognizing the limits of language is key to dissolving many philosophical problems. By seeing where language works and where it breaks down, we can avoid the confusion that comes from trying to use language to express what it cannot meaningfully express.
Conclusion: The Pragmatic Turn of the Later Wittgenstein
The later Wittgenstein’s work represents a radical shift in how we understand language, meaning, and philosophy. By focusing on the everyday use of language, he moved away from the abstract formalism of his early work and developed a more nuanced, pragmatic view. His insights into language-games, the rejection of private language, the role of forms of life, and the therapeutic role of philosophy have left a lasting legacy in contemporary philosophy, influencing fields as diverse as linguistics, cognitive science, and political theory.
Wittgenstein’s later philosophy invites us to look closely at how language operates in the real world, freeing us from the traps of abstraction and leading us to a clearer understanding of how we make sense of our experiences. In doing so, he offers a way of seeing philosophy not as a quest for ultimate answers, but as an ongoing process of clarification and insight.
4o
Cross College 
Leave a comment